Adding my neovim config

nvim/fonts/LICENCE-FAQ.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,177 @@
+                        Ubuntu Font Family Licensing FAQ
+
+  Stylistic Foundations
+
+   The Ubuntu Font Family is the first time that a libre typeface has been
+   designed professionally and explicitly with the intent of developing a
+   public and long-term community-based development process.
+
+   When developing an open project, it is generally necessary to have firm
+   foundations: a font needs to maintain harmony within itself even across
+   many type designers and writing systems. For the [1]Ubuntu Font Family,
+   the process has been guided with the type foundry Dalton Maag setting
+   the project up with firm stylistic foundation covering several
+   left-to-right scripts: Latin, Greek and Cyrillic; and right-to-left
+   scripts: Arabic and Hebrew (due in 2011).
+
+   With this starting point the community will, under the supervision of
+   [2]Canonical and [3]Dalton Maag, be able to build on the existing font
+   sources to expand their character coverage. Ultimately everybody will
+   be able to use the Ubuntu Font Family in their own written languages
+   across the whole of Unicode (and this will take some time!).
+
+  Licensing
+
+   The licence chosen by any free software project is one of the
+   foundational decisions that sets out how derivatives and contributions
+   can occur, and in turn what kind of community will form around the
+   project.
+
+   Using a licence that is compatible with other popular licences is a
+   powerful constraint because of the [4]network effects: the freedom to
+   share improvements between projects allows free software to reach
+   high-quality over time. Licence-proliferation leads to many
+   incompatible licences, undermining the network effect, the freedom to
+   share and ultimately making the libre movement that Ubuntu is a part of
+   less effective. For all kinds of software, writing a new licence is not
+   to be taken lightly and is a choice that needs to be thoroughly
+   justified if this path is taken.
+
+   Today it is not clear to Canonical what the best licence for a font
+   project like the Ubuntu Font Family is: one that starts life designed
+   by professionals and continues with the full range of community
+   development, from highly commercial work in new directions to curious
+   beginners' experimental contributions. The fast and steady pace of the
+   Ubuntu release cycle means that an interim libre licence has been
+   necessary to enable the consideration of the font family as part of
+   Ubuntu 10.10 operating system release.
+
+   Before taking any decision on licensing, Canonical as sponsor and
+   backer of the project has reviewed the many existing licenses used for
+   libre/open fonts and engaged the stewards of the most popular licenses
+   in detailed discussions. The current interim licence is the first step
+   in progressing the state-of-the-art in licensing for libre/open font
+   development.
+
+   The public discussion must now involve everyone in the (comparatively
+   new) area of the libre/open font community; including font users,
+   software freedom advocates, open source supporters and existing libre
+   font developers. Most importantly, the minds and wishes of professional
+   type designers considering entering the free software business
+   community must be taken on board.
+
+   Conversations and discussion has taken place, privately, with
+   individuals from the following groups (generally speaking personally on
+   behalf of themselves, rather than their affiliations):
+     * [5]SIL International
+     * [6]Open Font Library
+     * [7]Software Freedom Law Center
+     * [8]Google Font API
+
+    Document embedding
+
+   One issue highlighted early on in the survey of existing font licences
+   is that of document embedding. Almost all font licences, both free and
+   unfree, permit embedding a font into a document to a certain degree.
+   Embedding a font with other works that make up a document creates a
+   "combined work" and copyleft would normally require the whole document
+   to be distributed under the terms of the font licence. As beautiful as
+   the font might be, such a licence makes a font too restrictive for
+   useful general purpose digital publishing.
+
+   The situation is not entirely unique to fonts and is encountered also
+   with tools such as GNU Bison: a vanilla GNU GPL licence would require
+   anything generated with Bison to be made available under the terms of
+   the GPL as well. To avoid this, Bison is [9]published with an
+   additional permission to the GPL which allows the output of Bison to be
+   made available under any licence.
+
+   The conflict between licensing of fonts and licensing of documents, is
+   addressed in two popular libre font licences, the SIL OFL and GNU GPL:
+     * [10]SIL Open Font Licence: When OFL fonts are embedded in a
+       document, the OFL's terms do not apply to that document. (See
+       [11]OFL-FAQ for details.
+     * [12]GPL Font Exception: The situation is resolved by granting an
+       additional permission to allow documents to not be covered by the
+       GPL. (The exception is being reviewed).
+
+   The Ubuntu Font Family must also resolve this conflict, ensuring that
+   if the font is embedded and then extracted it is once again clearly
+   under the terms of its libre licence.
+
+    Long-term licensing
+
+   Those individuals involved, especially from Ubuntu and Canonical, are
+   interested in finding a long-term libre licence that finds broad favour
+   across the whole libre/open font community. The deliberation during the
+   past months has been on how to licence the Ubuntu Font Family in the
+   short-term, while knowingly encouraging everyone to pursue a long-term
+   goal.
+     * [13]Copyright assignment will be required so that the Ubuntu Font
+       Family's licensing can be progressively expanded to one (or more)
+       licences, as best practice continues to evolve within the
+       libre/open font community.
+     * Canonical will support and fund legal work on libre font licensing.
+       It is recognised that the cost and time commitments required are
+       likely to be significant. We invite other capable parties to join
+       in supporting this activity.
+
+   The GPL version 3 (GPLv3) will be used for Ubuntu Font Family build
+   scripts and the CC-BY-SA for associated documentation and non-font
+   content: all items which do not end up embedded in general works and
+   documents.
+
+Ubuntu Font Licence
+
+   For the short-term only, the initial licence is the [14]Ubuntu Font
+   License (UFL). This is loosely inspired from the work on the SIL
+   OFL 1.1, and seeks to clarify the issues that arose during discussions
+   and legal review, from the perspective of the backers, Canonical Ltd.
+   Those already using established licensing models such as the GPL, OFL
+   or Creative Commons licensing should have no worries about continuing
+   to use them. The Ubuntu Font Licence (UFL) and the SIL Open Font
+   Licence (SIL OFL) are not identical and should not be confused with
+   each other. Please read the terms precisely. The UFL is only intended
+   as an interim license, and the overriding aim is to support the
+   creation of a more suitable and generic libre font licence. As soon as
+   such a licence is developed, the Ubuntu Font Family will migrate to
+   it—made possible by copyright assignment in the interium. Between the
+   OFL 1.1, and the UFL 1.0, the following changes are made to produce the
+   Ubuntu Font Licence:
+     * Clarification:
+
+    1. Document embedding (see [15]embedding section above).
+    2. Apply at point of distribution, instead of receipt
+    3. Author vs. copyright holder disambiguation (type designers are
+       authors, with the copyright holder normally being the funder)
+    4. Define "Propagate" (for internationalisation, similar to the GPLv3)
+    5. Define "Substantially Changed"
+    6. Trademarks are explicitly not transferred
+    7. Refine renaming requirement
+
+     Streamlining:
+    8. Remove "not to be sold separately" clause
+    9. Remove "Reserved Font Name(s)" declaration
+
+   A visual demonstration of how these points were implemented can be
+   found in the accompanying coloured diff between SIL OFL 1.1 and the
+   Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0: [16]ofl-1.1-ufl-1.0.diff.html
+
+References
+
+   1. http://font.ubuntu.com/
+   2. http://www.canonical.com/
+   3. http://www.daltonmaag.com/
+   4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_effect
+   5. http://scripts.sil.org/
+   6. http://openfontlibrary.org/
+   7. http://www.softwarefreedom.org/
+   8. http://code.google.com/webfonts
+   9. http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#CanIUseGPLToolsForNF
+  10. http://scripts.sil.org/OFL_web
+  11. http://scripts.sil.org/OFL-FAQ_web
+  12. http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#FontException
+  13. https://launchpad.net/~uff-contributors
+  14. http://font.ubuntu.com/ufl/ubuntu-font-licence-1.0.txt
+  15. http://font.ubuntu.com/ufl/FAQ.html#embedding
+  16. http://font.ubuntu.com/ufl/ofl-1.1-ufl-1.0.diff.html

nvim/fonts/LICENCE.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+-------------------------------
+UBUNTU FONT LICENCE Version 1.0
+-------------------------------
+
+PREAMBLE
+This licence allows the licensed fonts to be used, studied, modified and
+redistributed freely. The fonts, including any derivative works, can be
+bundled, embedded, and redistributed provided the terms of this licence
+are met. The fonts and derivatives, however, cannot be released under
+any other licence. The requirement for fonts to remain under this
+licence does not require any document created using the fonts or their
+derivatives to be published under this licence, as long as the primary
+purpose of the document is not to be a vehicle for the distribution of
+the fonts.
+
+DEFINITIONS
+"Font Software" refers to the set of files released by the Copyright
+Holder(s) under this licence and clearly marked as such. This may
+include source files, build scripts and documentation.
+
+"Original Version" refers to the collection of Font Software components
+as received under this licence.
+
+"Modified Version" refers to any derivative made by adding to, deleting,
+or substituting -- in part or in whole -- any of the components of the
+Original Version, by changing formats or by porting the Font Software to
+a new environment.
+
+"Copyright Holder(s)" refers to all individuals and companies who have a
+copyright ownership of the Font Software.
+
+"Substantially Changed" refers to Modified Versions which can be easily
+identified as dissimilar to the Font Software by users of the Font
+Software comparing the Original Version with the Modified Version.
+
+To "Propagate" a work means to do anything with it that, without
+permission, would make you directly or secondarily liable for
+infringement under applicable copyright law, except executing it on a
+computer or modifying a private copy. Propagation includes copying,
+distribution (with or without modification and with or without charging
+a redistribution fee), making available to the public, and in some
+countries other activities as well.
+
+PERMISSION & CONDITIONS
+This licence does not grant any rights under trademark law and all such
+rights are reserved.
+
+Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
+copy of the Font Software, to propagate the Font Software, subject to
+the below conditions:
+
+1) Each copy of the Font Software must contain the above copyright
+notice and this licence. These can be included either as stand-alone
+text files, human-readable headers or in the appropriate machine-
+readable metadata fields within text or binary files as long as those
+fields can be easily viewed by the user.
+
+2) The font name complies with the following:
+(a) The Original Version must retain its name, unmodified.
+(b) Modified Versions which are Substantially Changed must be renamed to
+avoid use of the name of the Original Version or similar names entirely.
+(c) Modified Versions which are not Substantially Changed must be
+renamed to both (i) retain the name of the Original Version and (ii) add
+additional naming elements to distinguish the Modified Version from the
+Original Version. The name of such Modified Versions must be the name of
+the Original Version, with "derivative X" where X represents the name of
+the new work, appended to that name.
+
+3) The name(s) of the Copyright Holder(s) and any contributor to the
+Font Software shall not be used to promote, endorse or advertise any
+Modified Version, except (i) as required by this licence, (ii) to
+acknowledge the contribution(s) of the Copyright Holder(s) or (iii) with
+their explicit written permission.
+
+4) The Font Software, modified or unmodified, in part or in whole, must
+be distributed entirely under this licence, and must not be distributed
+under any other licence. The requirement for fonts to remain under this
+licence does not affect any document created using the Font Software,
+except any version of the Font Software extracted from a document
+created using the Font Software may only be distributed under this
+licence.
+
+TERMINATION
+This licence becomes null and void if any of the above conditions are
+not met.
+
+DISCLAIMER
+THE FONT SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
+EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF
+MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT OF
+COPYRIGHT, PATENT, TRADEMARK, OR OTHER RIGHT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
+COPYRIGHT HOLDER BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY,
+INCLUDING ANY GENERAL, SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
+DAMAGES, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
+FROM, OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE FONT SOFTWARE OR FROM OTHER
+DEALINGS IN THE FONT SOFTWARE.

nvim/fonts/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+# Nerd Fonts
+
+This is an archived font from the Nerd Fonts release v3.3.0.
+
+For more information see:
+* https://github.com/ryanoasis/nerd-fonts/
+* https://github.com/ryanoasis/nerd-fonts/releases/latest/
+
+# Ubuntu Mono
+
+The Ubuntu Font Family are a set of matching new libre/open fonts in
+development during 2010--2011.  And with further expansion work and
+bug fixing during 2015.  The development is being funded by
+Canonical Ltd on behalf the wider Free Software community and the
+Ubuntu project.  The technical font design work and implementation is
+being undertaken by Dalton Maag.
+
+Both the final font Truetype/OpenType files and the design files used
+to produce the font family are distributed under an open licence and
+you are expressly encouraged to experiment, modify, share and improve.
+
+http://font.ubuntu.com/
+
+Version: 0.80
+
+## Which font?
+
+### TL;DR
+
+* Pick your font family:
+  * If you are limited to monospaced fonts (because of your terminal, etc) then pick a font with `Nerd Font Mono` (or `NFM`).
+  * If you want to have bigger icons (usually around 1.5 normal letters wide) pick a font without `Mono` i.e. `Nerd Font` (or `NF`). Most terminals support this, but ymmv.
+  * If you work in a proportional context (GUI elements or edit a presentation etc) pick a font with `Nerd Font Propo` (or `NFP`).
+
+### Ligatures
+
+Ligatures are generally preserved in the patched fonts.
+Nerd Fonts `v2.0.0` had no ligatures in the `Nerd Font Mono` fonts, this has been dropped with `v2.1.0`.
+If you have a ligature-aware terminal and don't want ligatures you can (usually) disable them in the terminal settings.
+
+### Explanation
+
+Once you narrow down your font choice of family (`Droid Sans`, `Inconsolata`, etc) and style (`bold`, `italic`, etc) you have 2 main choices:
+
+#### `Option 1: Download already patched font`
+
+ * For a stable version download a font package from the [release page](https://github.com/ryanoasis/nerd-fonts/releases)
+ * Or download the development version from the folders here
+
+#### `Option 2: Patch your own font`
+
+ * Patch your own variations with the various options provided by the font patcher (i.e. not include all symbols for smaller font size)
+
+For more information see: [The FAQ](https://github.com/ryanoasis/nerd-fonts/wiki/FAQ-and-Troubleshooting#which-font)
+
+[SIL-RFN]:http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?item_id=OFL_web_fonts_and_RFNs#14cbfd4a
+